Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Srinivas Pampati Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Srinivas Pampati Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) No Capital Gains Taxable on Mere Execution of Development Agreement Without Transfer of Possession – Section 2(47)(v) Not Attracted: ITAT Hyderabad Both Assessees were joint landowners of 6,380 sq. yds. of land at Karimnagar. On 02.03.2013, they along with two others entered into a Development Agreement-cum-GPA (JDA) with M/s. Shriyam Infrastructure for construction of a multi-storeyed residential complex. Under the JDA: The total built-up area was 1,28,350 sq. ft. Landowners were to receive 32% & developer 68% of the constructed area. Stamp ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

‘Make Available’ Test Not Met, No TDS on US Software Contractor Payments: ITAT Bangalore Section 54 Exemption Available for Every House Sold: Bengaluru ITAT Books Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Non-Audit; 8% Profit Estimate Quashed Apartment Owners’ Association Not Taxable at Maximum Marginal Rate: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Allowed Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Scheduled & Co-op Banks View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031