Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohamed Akbar Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mohamed Akbar Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Tribunal Restricts Addition – Entire ₹5 Cr Gain Cannot Be Taxed Again- Only Balance Left in CGAS After 3 Years Taxable; Only Unutilised Capital Gain of ₹1.3 Cr Taxable- AO Erred in Adding Entire Capital Gains Assessee sold inherited property in July 2011 for ₹5 crore & claimed exemption u/s 54 by depositing ₹2.5 crore in Capital Gain Accounts Scheme with intent to purchase two flats. Due to dispute with builder, he received only one flat (costing ₹1.19 crore) & the balance ₹1.30 crore remained unutilised beyond 3 years. AO, in reassess...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930