Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arham Enterprise Vs ITO (TDS) (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arham Enterprise Vs ITO (TDS) (ITAT Rajkot) 518-Day Delay Condoned- Ex Parte CIT(A) Order Set Aside- Tribunal Stresses Merits Over Technicalities AO treated the Assessee as a defaulter for non-collection of TCS on S.S. scrap & raised demand of Rs. 2.57 lakh for AY 2016-17 & Rs. 2.17 lakh for AY 2017-18, along with interest. Appeals before CIT(A)/NFAC were dismissed, doubting genuineness of Form 27C declarations filed belatedly after 28 months, & confirming liability. Assessee explained that notices & orders were uploaded on an email linked to a partner, which was wrongly forwar...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031