Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : AZB And Partners Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
AZB And Partners Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The Tribunal held that mere inadequacy of enquiry by the AO cannot justify invoking Section 263. AZB & Partners’ assessment was upheld, reinforcing limits on revision powers under Explanation 2(a). ITAT Mumbai Quashes 263 Against AZB & Partners – No Revision for Adequate Enquiry- Mere Inadequacy of Enquiry Cannot Justify 263 – Tribunal Rules for Law Firm- Explanation 2(a) to 263 Not Blanket Power – ITAT Reaffirms Limits on Revision Assessee, a leading law firm, had filed return declaring income of Rs. 281.18 crore. The assessment was compl...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930