Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : AZB And Partners Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
AZB And Partners Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The Tribunal held that mere inadequacy of enquiry by the AO cannot justify invoking Section 263. AZB & Partners’ assessment was upheld, reinforcing limits on revision powers under Explanation 2(a). ITAT Mumbai Quashes 263 Against AZB & Partners – No Revision for Adequate Enquiry- Mere Inadequacy of Enquiry Cannot Justify 263 – Tribunal Rules for Law Firm- Explanation 2(a) to 263 Not Blanket Power – ITAT Reaffirms Limits on Revision Assessee, a leading law firm, had filed return declaring income of Rs. 281.18 crore. The assessment was compl...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930