Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jignesh Mahesh Gohel Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jignesh Mahesh Gohel Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Time-Barred 148 Notice Dooms 263 Revision – ITAT Mumbai Quashes PCIT’s Order; Non-Est Reassessment Cannot Be Revised Assessee had originally filed return declaring income of Rs. 5.01 lakh. On receipt of information from the Investigation Wing that the Assessee had allegedly paid ‘On Money’ of Rs. 81.12 lakh to M/s Runwal Group for purchase of a shop, AO reopened the assessment by issuing notice u/s 148 & finally passed reassessment order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B on 30.03.2023 accepting the returned income. PCIT later invoked Explanation 2 to s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930