Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jagdish Raghunathji Lahoti Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jagdish Raghunathji Lahoti Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Time-Barred Notice Dooms Reassessment: ITAT Mumbai Quashes 148 Action- Third-Party Search Can’t Trigger 147: Tribunal Deletes Additions of ₹13 Cr ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment notices issued u/s 148, holding them to be time barred in the light of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in UOI v. Rajeev Bansal [2024] 167 taxmann.com 70 (SC). The case arose from information unearthed during a search in the premises of Shree Renuka Mata Multi State Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., which revealed substantial cash deposits in the na...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930