Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ashish Anand Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ashish Anand Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi: Employer’s Cash Deposits in Employee’s Account—Addition Remanded, 60% Tax u/s 115BBE Not Applicable for AY 2017-18 Delhi Tribunal dealt with the issue of unexplained cash deposits during the demonetization period. AO made an addition of ₹26,18,000/- u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE on the ground that substantial cash was deposited in Assessee’s bank accounts . Assessee contended that he was an employee of Shri Jitendra Pal, proprietor of J.P. Mobiles, & that the cash was deposited by his employer in Assessee’s accounts during demonetization. It...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031