Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shah Dilip Sankarchand Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shah Dilip Sankarchand Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITO vs DCIT Jurisdiction Clash – ITO’s Notice invalid where DCIT alone had authority; Assessment collapses if ITO Issues Notice in DCIT’s domain – ITAT Ahmedabad. Assessee contested the validity of the assessment framed u/s 144 on the ground that the m & atory notice u/s 143(2) was issued by a non-jurisdictional ITO. The returned income of  Assessee being above ₹25 lakhs, the pecuniary jurisdiction to frame assessment vested with DCIT. However, the notice was issued by the ITO, who did not have jurisdiction. Based on non-participat...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930