Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amar Chemicals Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-2020
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amar Chemicals Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) When 143(2) Goes Missing, Reassessment Cannot Survive- Jurisdictional Defect Fatal – Mandatory Notice Ignored, Assessment Annulled – ITAT Delhi Delhi ITAT quashed the reassessment proceedings on the ground of non-issuance of mandatory notice u/s 143(2). Assessee, a partnership firm, had originally filed its return of income on 23.10.2019 declaring income of ₹2,41,560. Subsequently, a survey was conducted u/s 133A at its premises & based on information gathered, AO issued a notice u/s 148 on 30.03.2023.In response, Assessee, through letters ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930