Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Alok Anand Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Alok Anand Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore: CIT(A) cannot travel beyond Reopening Reasons – Additions on Share Trading Deposits Quashed Assessee, a UK-based professional, had not filed returns for AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13. Based on information from the Investigation Wing,  AO reopened assessments u/s 147/148 alleging Cash deposits in bank accounts &   Large investments in mutual funds. As Assessee did not respond to statutory notices,  AO completed the reassessment u/s 144 r.w.s. 147, treating ₹2.08 lakh as unexplained cash deposits&   ₹1.41 crore (AY 2011-12) &...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930