This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Disallowed Expenditure Claim Not Grounds for Section 271(1)(c) Penalty: ITAT Jaipur
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Pradeep Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Jaipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Pradeep Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jaipur Bench, has set aside a penalty of Rs. 1,71,452/- levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against assessee Pradeep Garg for the assessment year 2010-11. The penalty, initially imposed by the Income Tax Officer (ITO) and confirmed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), was challenged on grounds of jurisdiction, a vague show cause notice, and the merits of the additions.
The case originated from the reopening of Pradeep Garg’s assessment for AY 2010-11 under Section 147 of the Inco...
