This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Notice proposing penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) without specifying limb is bad-in-law
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- PCIT-7 Vs Quippo Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
PCIT-7 Vs Quippo Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Delhi High Court held that issuance of notice for initiating penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act without specifying the limb under which the penalty was proposed to be levied is bad-in-law. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
Facts- AO disallowed the Assessee’s claim for expenditure of ₹2,50,00,000/- for availing professional services and further disallowed a sum of ₹223,03,31,321/- on account of interest claimed by the Assessee u/s. 36(1)(iii) of the Act and assessed the total income...




