Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Central Excise Valuation Must Follow Its Own Law, Income Tax Provisions Not a Basis for Reassessment

Case Law Details

Case Name
Shiva Steel Industries (Nagpur) Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Shiva Steel Industries (Nagpur) Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) In the case of Shiva Steel Industries (Nagpur) Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, set aside the central excise duty demand imposed by the department. The dispute centered around whether the appellant, Shiva Steel Industries, and its buyer, M/s Ujjawal Ispat Private Limited (UIPL), were “related persons” under Section 4(3)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The department had relied on income tax filings, where the com...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *