This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Assessee Proves Investment Sourced from Family; Unexplained Investment Addition deleted
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kshama Sanjay Tripathi Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Kshama Sanjay Tripathi Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
In the case of Kshama Sanjay Tripathi Vs ITO, the ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on the appeal concerning unexplained investment in property for the Assessment Year 2010-11. The assessee, identified as a non-filer, faced an addition of ₹40,00,000 for property purchase and ₹17,58,500 for cash deposits in her bank account. The Assessing Officer (AO) completed the assessment under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, considering the investments as unexplained. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] later deleted the cash deposit a...
Author Info
