This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Notice u/r 7 of Insolvency Rules doesn’t amount to invoking of guarantee: NCLAT Delhi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- State Bank of India Vs Deepak Kumar Singhania (NCLAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- NCLAT
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
State Bank of India Vs Deepak Kumar Singhania (NCLAT Delhi)
NCLAT Delhi held that issuance of notice under rule 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019 doesn’t amount to invoking of guarantee.
Facts- The Corporate Debtor – LML Ltd. was extended Financial Facilities by State Bank of India. The Respondent – Deepak Kumar Singhania executed a Deed of Guarantee dated 28.03.2005 along with other two Personal Guarantors in favour of SBI and a Multi-Partite Agreement date...
Author Info
