This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Notice u/s 143(2) was invalid as the same issued by another AO to whom jurisdiction was transferred much later
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Rajnil Sales Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ACIT Vs Rajnil Sales Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Conclusion: Notice under section 143(2) could be issued only by the jurisdictional AO within the time limit of issuing notice prescribed under the law. The jurisdiction over assessee was with the ITO Ward/Circle -9(3) Kolkata and not with the ACIT, Central Circle-14. Therefore, the notice issued by the ACIT, Central Circle-14 was invalid and without jurisdiction.
Held: The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment and notice under section 143(2). After the search and seizure operation conducted on Prakash Industries Ltd., assessee com...






