Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt Ltd (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt Ltd (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore held that no separate benchmarking of royalty payment required when the margin is accepted to be at arms length price (ALP) by the TPO. Thus, appeal of the revenue dismissed. Facts- The assessee is a subsidiary of Toyota Motor Corporation, a company incorporated under the laws of Japan. The assessee filed their return of income on 29/09/2008 declaring a total income of Rs. 365,08,48,458/-. Thereafter, the return was processed u/s. 143(1) of the Act. Later on a reference u/s. 92CA of the act was made to the TPO. TPO, insofa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930