Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Mere Entering into Development Agreement doesn’t Allow Section 45(2) Invocation: ITAT Jaipur

Case Law Details

Case Name
DCIT Vs Man Prakash Talkies Pvt Ltd. (ITAT Jaipur)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2008-09
Advertisement
DCIT Vs Man Prakash Talkies Pvt Ltd. (ITAT Jaipur) ITAT Jaipur held that mere entering into the Development Agreement would not permit invocation of section 45(2) of the Income Tax Act. There is no positive act which indicates that the assessee has treated capital asset as stock-in-trade. Facts- Revenue has preferred the present appeal mainly on the ground that whether CIT(A) is right in quashing the reopening proceedings of AO ignoring the fact that the assessee has converted its capital reopening proceedings of AO ignoring the fact that the assessee has converted its capital asset into stock...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *