This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Rejection of refund claim for non-mentioning of period particulars in CA’s certificate is harsh: CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Jumar Trade Links Vs Commissioner of Customs (Exports) (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Jumar Trade Links Vs Commissioner of Customs (Exports) (CESTAT Chennai)
CESTAT Chennai rejection of refund claim merely for non-mentioning of period particulars in CA’s certificate unjustifiable as rejection of claim on this basis would be harsh.
Facts- Appellant filed a refund claim of Rs.2,28,822/- being the amount paid against 4% Additional Duty of Customs (ADC) for the import of Galvanized Steel Coils/Strips vide 5 Bills of Entry. The appellant claimed refund in terms of Notification No. 102/2007-Cus dated 14.9.2007 as amended and submitted the relevant documents for proof of the same. T...
Author Info
