Case Law Details
Newton Engineering And Chemicals Limited And Ors Vs UEM India Pvt Ltd (Delhi High Court)
Introduction: The Delhi High Court recently upheld the simultaneous continuation of arbitration proceedings and proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act). The court dismissed a petition seeking to quash the complaint under Section 138 NI Act filed by the respondent company against the petitioners.
Background: The petitioners and respondent company had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for a project. Subsequently, a post-dated cheque issued by the petitioners was dishonored, leading to a complaint under Section 138 NI Act. The petitioners argued that ongoing arbitration proceedings rendered the complaint invalid.
Legal Analysis: The court, referring to the Supreme Court’s judgment in Sri Krishna Agencies v. State of A.P. & Anr., clarified that arbitration proceedings and proceedings under Section 138 NI Act arise from separate causes of action. The court emphasized that the pendency of arbitration proceedings does not affect the validity of proceedings under Section 138 NI Act. The petitioners’ argument that the complaint was not maintainable due to ongoing arbitration was rejected.
Conclusion: The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition, affirming the independent nature of arbitration and Section 138 NI Act proceedings. The ruling underscores that both proceedings can coexist when arising from distinct causes of action.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
