This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Cognizance taken under repealed law is valid if it is provided by provision of ‘Repeal and Savings’ under the new Law
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- First Global Stockbroking Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs Anil Rishiraj & Anr (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
First Global Stockbroking Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs Anil Rishiraj & Anr (Supreme Court of India)
Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that the Enforcement Officer appointed under Section 3 of FERA, 1973 was authorized to file complaint under provisions of FERA even after getting repealed by the virtue of S. 49 of FEMA under the heading ‘Repeal and Savings’.
Facts: The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 was brought into force with effect from 1st June 2000. By virtue of S. 49(1) of FEMA, the FERA, 1973 stood repealed. On 11th February 2002, the...
Author Info
