This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 40A(3) Terms Not Absolute; Rule 6DD Circumstances Not Exhaustive
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Smt. Shashikala Ram Kumar Vs ACIT (Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Smt. Shashikala Ram Kumar Vs ACIT (Hyderabad)
Assesee disputed additions made u/s40(a)(ia) & 40A(3) before the CIT (A) and produced certificates under proviso to section 201(1) whereby CIT(A) deleted the 40(a)(ia) addition but confirmed the addition u/s40A(3). On further appeal before the the Tribunal Revenue contended that unless the assessee proves the circumstances under rule 6DD, he cannot claim any exception to sec 40A(3).
Assessee produced a certificate issued by payee stating that they refused to entertain cheques since cheques issued by the assessee were bounced on account of attac...
Author Info
