Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Job Worker liable to pay duty if Principal manufacturer did not file requisite undertaking: CESTAT

Case Law Details

Case Name
Commissioner Central Excise & CGST Vs Khemani Metal Industries Private Limited (CESTAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Commissioner Central Excise & CGST Vs Khemani Metal Industries Private Limited (CESTAT Delhi) Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal held that where a principal manufacturer did not file the requisite undertaking to the jurisdictional authority in terms of Notification No. 214/86, then the job worker was liable to pay the duty on the goods manufactured. In such circumstances, it was held therein that job worker automatically is the manufacturer and therefore liable to pay duty irrespective of the ownership of the said goods. Facts: The impugned appeals have been f...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *