This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Non-Filing of CA Certificate with refund claim: CESTAT allows filing
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rajrani Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commr. of CGST & CX, Kolkata South Commissionerate (CESTAT Kolkata)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Kolkata
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Rajrani Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commr. of CGST & CX, Kolkata South Commissionerate (CESTAT Kolkata)
It is seen that the Appellant has filed the Refund Application in Form A-1 filling up almost all the details. If some details have been left out, they can be considered as procedural lapse. They have also enclosed copies of the relevant invoices which can be verified with the Form A-1 submitted by them. However, it is seen that the Certificate from the Chartered Accountant is mandated under Para 3(i) of the Notification if the refund claim amount is more than 0.5% of the FOB value of the goods ...
