This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No limitation period for refund claim on duty paid twice on import Bill of Entry
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ericsson India Private Limited Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Ericsson India Private Limited Vs Commissioner, Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
CESTAT held that amount paid for the same duty but twice, one of the payment has to be refunded. Otherwise also in terms of section 17 of Limitation Act, whenever there is an application for a relief from the consequences of a mistake, the period of limitation would not begin to run until the plaintiff or applicant has discovered the mistake, or could with reasonable diligence, have discovered it. Since from this angle also, the bar of limitation is held to have wrongly applied against the impugned refund application. The r...





