This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Mere fact that addition has been made or confirmed does not per se lead to imposition of penalty
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Giesecke and Devrient [I] Pvt. Ltd Vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2005-06
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advocate Akhilesh Kumar Sah
Giesecke and Devrient [I] Pvt. Ltd Vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
A issue being a debatable issue at the point of time when the assessee filed its return of income penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) on that count cannot be sustained, mere fact that the addition has been made or confirmed does not per se lead to imposition of penalty
Recently, in Giesecke and Devrient [I] Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT [ITA No. 1458/DEL/2017 A.Y.: 2005-06, decided on 26.06.2018], the solitary grievance of the assessee was that the CIT(A) erred in upholding the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(...
