Case Law Details
Case Name : Saurabh Bansal Vs. ITO (ITAT Ahemdabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Ahmedabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Penalty is leviable within meaning of Explanation 1(B) to section 271(1)(c) in respect of alleged gifts received by minor sons of assessee which are finally found transferred to assessee’s books
ITAT AHMEDABAD BENCH “D”,
Saurabh Bansal Vs. ITO,
APPEAL NO: ITA No. 351/Ahd/2008,
DECIDED ON June 25, 2010
ORDER
Per D. C. Agrawal, Accountant Member.
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A) in which he has confirmed the penalty of Rs.2,08,380/- under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The assessee raised following ground :-
1. On the fac...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

