Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 143(1) Intimation Held Invalid as Scrutiny Proceedings Had Already Begun

Case Law Details

Case Name
M.P. Madhyam Vs DCIT (CPC) (ITAT Indore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2016-17
Advertisement M.P. Madhyam Vs DCIT (CPC) (ITAT Indore) The assessee filed two appeals against separate orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), both dated 18.10.2022, arising from the processing of returns under Section 143(1) by the Central Processing Centre (CPC), Bengaluru for Assessment Years 2016-17 and 2017-18. The appeals challenged the validity of the adjustments made under Section 143(1), including denial of revenue expenditure, denial of deduction under Section 11(1)(a), and levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C. Assessee&...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,551

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *