This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence When Property Investment Is Fully Explained: ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sanobar Ajaz Ahmed Saudagar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Sanobar Ajaz Ahmed Saudagar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Deletes ₹80.10 Lakh Addition: Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence When Property Investment Is Fully Explained
The Mumbai ITAT deleted an addition of ₹80.10 lakh made under Section 69 in respect of a residential property purchase, holding that once the assessee had established the identity of the contributor, financial capacity, source of funds and actual utilization towards property acquisition, the investment could not be treated as unexplained merely because certain remittance records from a Dubai Exchange Bureau were unavailable after ...
Author Info
