This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Part Payment Through Bank Does the Trick: ITAT Deletes Section 56(2)(vii) Addition Despite 7-Year Gap in Registration
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Arvind Apte Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Arvind Apte Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Part Payment Through Bank Does the Trick: ITAT Deletes Section 56(2)(vii) Addition Despite 7-Year Gap in Registration
2011 Agreement Saves Buyer from Section 56(2)(vii): ITAT Deletes Addition Based on 2018 Stamp Duty Value
The Mumbai ITAT deleted an addition of ₹22.38 lakh made under Section 56(2)(vii), holding that where substantial payments towards purchase of immovable property were made through banking channels pursuant to an earlier agreement, the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the first and second provisos to Section 56(2)(vii) and the stamp du...
Author Info
