Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCIT Vs M.Kiran Kumar (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
PCIT Vs M.Kiran Kumar (Madras High Court) Summary: The Madras High Court upheld the ITAT’s order deleting multiple additions made solely on the basis of a statement recorded during search without corroborative evidence. The Court held that an admission under Section 132(4), especially when made to “buy peace,” cannot independently justify additions unless supported by material evidence. It found that the alleged undisclosed income was not attributable to the assessee in his individual capacity and lacked supporting proof. The Court also affirmed that business transactions routed through...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ajay Kumar Agrawal FCA, a science graduate and fellow chartered accountant in practice for over 26 years. Ajay has been in continuous practice mainly in corporate consultancy, litigation in the field of Direct and Indirect laws, Regulatory Law, and commercial law beside the Auditing of corporate and View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Gross Receipts Cannot Be Taxed if Charitable Expenditure Was Undisputed: ITAT Delhi ITAT Grants TDS Credit Despite Employer’s Failure to Deposit Tax with Government ITAT Deletes Section 270A Penalty as Estimated Addition Cannot Justify Penalty ITAT Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition as AO Failed to Disprove Documentary Evidence TDS Under Section 194J Upheld for Coaching Institute Faculty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930