Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ajaram Adararam Mali Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ajaram Adararam Mali Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Deletes Section 69 Additions: Third-Party Excel Sheets & Statements Without Corroboration Have No Evidentiary Value In a crucial ruling, the ITAT Mumbai held that additions under Section 69 cannot be sustained solely on the basis of third-party statements and excel sheet data found during search, without independent corroborative evidence linking the assessee. The case involved alleged cash (“on-money”) payments for property purchase based on data recovered from a pen drive belonging to an employee of the developer group. The a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930