Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nalwad Prabhu0 Somashekharappa Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nalwad Prabhu Somashekharappa Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Section 54F Claim Revived – ITAT Allows Fresh Chance to Prove Construction with Additional Evidence The ITAT Bangalore restored the issue of Section 54F deduction to the Assessing Officer, holding that the assessee should be given an opportunity to substantiate the claim with comprehensive documentary evidence. In this case, the assessee claimed deduction of about ₹11.61 lakhs under Section 54F on capital gains arising from sale of property, stating that the amount was invested in construction of a residential house jointly with his bro...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Addition on Loans From Wife and Company Deleted: Delhi ITAT Section 271D Penalty Quashed as Six-Month Limitation Expired: Bengaluru ITAT Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition as CHA Customs Duty Collections Are Fiduciary Receipts Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition for Recorded Jewellery Sales During Demonetisation Mumbai ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition as Marriage Gifts and Past Savings Explain Cash Deposits View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031