Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Valar and Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Valar and Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Penalty U/s 271DA & 271E Invalid When Original Assessment Set Aside – ITAT Deletes Penalties The assessee, a civil contractor firm, filed its return for AY 2018-19 declaring income of ₹63.58 lakh. During scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3), the AO made additions and initiated penalty proceedings including u/s 271DA (violation of sec. 269ST for cash receipts) and u/s 271E (violation of sec. 269T). Consequently, penalties of ₹44.96 lakh u/s 271DA and ₹2 lakh u/s 271E were levied by NFAC and confirmed by the CIT(A). Subsequently, the original assessm...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Grants Full TDS Credit Despite Employer’s Failure to Deposit Tax ITAT Deletes Bogus LTCG Addition on Green Crest Shares; Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 270A Penalty on Estimated Income and Defective Show-Cause Notice Bangalore ITAT: TDS Credit Cannot Be Denied Merely Because It Was Omitted in Original Return Assessment on Amalgamated Bank’s Predecessor Held Void; ITAT Quashes Order Passed in Name of Non-Existent Syndicate Bank View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930