This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty U/s 271DA & 271E Invalid When Original Assessment Set Aside – ITAT Deletes Penalties
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Valar and Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Valar and Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Penalty U/s 271DA & 271E Invalid When Original Assessment Set Aside – ITAT Deletes Penalties
The assessee, a civil contractor firm, filed its return for AY 2018-19 declaring income of ₹63.58 lakh. During scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3), the AO made additions and initiated penalty proceedings including u/s 271DA (violation of sec. 269ST for cash receipts) and u/s 271E (violation of sec. 269T). Consequently, penalties of ₹44.96 lakh u/s 271DA and ₹2 lakh u/s 271E were levied by NFAC and confirmed by the CIT(A).
Subsequently, the...






