Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Varun Traders Vs DCIT (ITAT Amritsar)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Varun Traders Vs DCIT (ITAT Amritsar) Survey Surrender & Diary Entries Held Insufficient – ₹266 Cr Addition Deleted – Statements u/s 133A Have No Evidentiary Value Without Corroboration – ITAT Amritsar During survey u/s 133A, the assessee allegedly surrendered ₹266 lakh based on entries in a diary titled “Building Account.” The surrender was later retracted claiming coercion. AO treated the surrender as undisclosed investment and made addition, which was partly sustained by CIT(A) based on valuation report. ITAT held that statement recorded during survey has limited evidentia...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031