Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Unify Texturisers Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Unify Texturisers Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai) Reassessment quashed – Wrong sanctioning authority u/s 151 after 3 years; entire proceedings held void – ITAT Mumbai In DCIT vs Unify Texturisers Pvt. Ltd. (A.Y. 2017-18), reassessment was initiated under the new regime with multiple additions. The assessee challenged validity of reopening on the ground that sanction u/s 151 was granted by the Principal Commissioner, though more than three years had elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year. The ITAT examined section 151 and relied on binding Bombay High Court judgment in A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period DVO Valuation Without Notice Invalid: Matter Remanded for Fresh Determination Section 56(2)(x): Stamp Value on Booking Date to Apply – ITAT Deletes Addition Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Time-Barred – ITAT Quashes Entire Penny Stock Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930