Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Reassessment Quashed – Wrong Sanction u/s 151 After 3 Years: ITAT Mumbai

Case Law Details

Case Name
DCIT Vs Unify Texturisers Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement DCIT Vs Unify Texturisers Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai) Reassessment quashed – Wrong sanctioning authority u/s 151 after 3 years; entire proceedings held void – ITAT Mumbai In DCIT vs Unify Texturisers Pvt. Ltd. (A.Y. 2017-18), reassessment was initiated under the new regime with multiple additions. The assessee challenged validity of reopening on the ground that sanction u/s 151 was granted by the Principal Commissioner, though more than three years had elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year. The ITAT examined section 151 and relied on binding Bombay High Co...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,965

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *