Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Unify Texturisers Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Unify Texturisers Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai) Reassessment quashed – Wrong sanctioning authority u/s 151 after 3 years; entire proceedings held void – ITAT Mumbai In DCIT vs Unify Texturisers Pvt. Ltd. (A.Y. 2017-18), reassessment was initiated under the new regime with multiple additions. The assessee challenged validity of reopening on the ground that sanction u/s 151 was granted by the Principal Commissioner, though more than three years had elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year. The ITAT examined section 151 and relied on binding Bombay High Court judgment in A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Addition on Loans From Wife and Company Deleted: Delhi ITAT Section 271D Penalty Quashed as Six-Month Limitation Expired: Bengaluru ITAT Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition as CHA Customs Duty Collections Are Fiduciary Receipts Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition for Recorded Jewellery Sales During Demonetisation Mumbai ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition as Marriage Gifts and Past Savings Explain Cash Deposits View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031