Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Thiruvengatam Vinayagam Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Thiruvengatam Vinayagam Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Transport income to be estimated using U/s 44AE as guiding yardstick – Multiple additions deleted; matter partly remanded – ITAT Chennai In Thiruvengatam Vinayagam vs ITO (A.Y. 2016-17), the assessee, engaged in lorry transport business owning more than ten trucks, faced several additions after special audit u/s 142(2A), including LTCG, unexplained credits u/s 68, investments u/s 69 and disallowances u/s 40(a)(ia), resulting in assessed income of ₹1.51 crore against returned income of ₹8.30 lakh. The ITAT noted that books and vouchers were ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930