Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Zeliant Corp Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Zeliant Corp Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) In this case, the assessee challenged the validity of the assessment framed u/s 144 wherein cash deposits were treated as unexplained money u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE. The primary contention before ITAT was that the assessment order itself was void ab initio as notices & assessment order were never validly served within limitation as per procedure prescribed u/s 282 r.w.r. Rule 127. The AO had made addition of ₹83,50,900/- alleging unexplained deposits during demonetisation after best-judgment assessment due to alleged non-compliance. Though CIT(A) restored th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930