This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) Deleted for Want of DVO Reference: ITAT Lucknow Quashes ₹11.59 Lakh Addition
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sanjeev Kumar Saxena Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Lucknow
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Sanjeev Kumar Saxena Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)
The Lucknow SMC Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow Bench partly allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2015-16 and deleted the addition of ₹11,59,091 made under section 56(2)(vii)(b) on account of alleged difference between stamp-duty value and actual purchase consideration of immovable property.
The Assessing Officer had invoked section 56(2)(vii)(b) (read with section 50C principles) without making a mandatory reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO), despite a specific request by the assessee disputing the stamp-duty...




