Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Ashutosh Foods (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Ashutosh Foods (ITAT Delhi) Reassessment Quashed for Non-Issue of 143(2) – Return Filed After 148 Notice Still Triggers Mandatory Jurisdictional Requirement The Delhi ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and allowed the assessee’s cross-objection by quashing the reassessment for AY 2015-16 on the ground that no notice under Section 143(2) was issued after the assessee responded to notice under Section 148. The Tribunal noted that although the assessee did not file a fresh return within 30 days of the 148 notice, it had subsequently requested that the original return filed under S...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Ad Hoc Commission Cap Without Comparables Invalid; Section 40A(2)(b) Inapplicable:Bengaluru ITAT Mumbai ITAT Restricts Bogus Purchase Addition to Gross Profit Element New Charitable Trust Cannot Be Denied 12AB Registration for Limited Activities: Mumbai ITAT Bengaluru ITAT Allows Fresh Challenge to Reassessment & Section 80P Disallowance Bengaluru ITAT Allows Success Fee as Transfer Expense Under Section 48 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031