Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Nivaya Resources Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Nivaya Resources Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Cash Deposits During Demonetisation Explained by Opening Imprest Balance: ITAT Delhi Rejects Section 68 Addition The Delhi Bench of the ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and partly allowed the assessee’s cross-objection in a case involving cash deposits made during the demonetisation period. The Assessing Officer had treated cash deposits of ₹2.12 crore as unexplained under section 68, alleging that the assessee failed to justify the source and also rejected the books under section 145(3). The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s finding that t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930