Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anirudh Bhimjibhai Dudhat Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anirudh Bhimjibhai Dudhat Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Section 68 Addition Cannot Be Sustained Without Proper Evaluation — ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2014-15 and set aside the order of the CIT(A) for failure to adjudicate the issue of unsecured loans under section 68 in a reasoned and judicial manner. The Assessing Officer had made an ex-parte addition of ₹38.67 lakh under section 68 in respect of unsecured loans from five parties, citing non-compliance during assessment proceedings. In appellate proceedi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930