Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Balguri Rajeshwar Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-2017
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Balguri Rajeshwar Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Reassessment Quashed for Breach of Faceless Regime — JAO-Issued Notices Invalid The Hyderabad Bench of the ITAT quashed the reassessment for AY 2016-17 holding that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) had issued the show-cause notice under section 148A(b), passed the order under section 148A(d), and issued the section 148 notice himself, without following the mandatory faceless procedure prescribed under sections 144B and 151A read with CBDT’s notifications. Relying on binding jurisdictional precedent—especially Kankanala Ravindra Redd...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930