This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Smart Robot cannot be Treated as Electronic Toy Due to ADP Functionality
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- RN Chidakashi Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
RN Chidakashi Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT Chennai) decided two connected appeals concerning the customs classification of the AI-powered “MIKO-3” smart robot imported by the appellant company. Although arising from separate adjudication orders, both appeals involved an identical issue and were therefore heard together and disposed of by a common order.
The appellant is engaged in the business of importing and manufacturing Automatic Data Processing Units for learning a...






