Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhartiya Samruddhi Finance Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhartiya Samruddhi Finance Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Demonetisation Cash ≠ Black Money: NBFC’s EMI Recoveries Explained, S.68 Deleted & 43B Deduction Allowed—ITAT Delhi Assessee, a RBI-registered NBFC & Micro-Finance Institution, faced addition of ₹2.71 crore u/s 68 on account of cash deposits during demonetisation period, AO alleging unexplained money & even invoking s.269T. Assessee explained that cash represented EMI recoveries from about 17,280 existing borrowers, mostly rural & semi-urban, where cash recovery was normal industry practice, digital payments were non-e...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930