Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Santosh Ramdas Moze Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Santosh Ramdas Moze Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Assessee had not filed return for AY 2015-16. Case was flagged as P1 risk on Insight Portal due to large property transaction. AO issued notice u/s 148A(b) on 23.03.2022; no reply was filed. AO thereafter issued notice u/s 148 & initiated reassessment. In response to 142(1), Assessee submitted Development Agreement dated 29.05.2014 showing transfer of land to R.G. Developers on 50% sharing basis with possession handed over & refundable security deposit of Rs.40 lakh received. AO invoked s.2(47)(v) r.w.s.53A, held that transfer occurred in AY 2015-...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930