This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Delay Condoned Due to Bona Fide Reason: Penalty Appeal Revived
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Satbir Kumar Sarlia Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Satbir Kumar Sarlia Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
VSV Settlement for Quantum Does Not Wipe Out Independent 271D Penalty-960-Day Delay Condoned; Penalty u/s 271D Remanded—
Assessee filed appeal against penalty u/s 271D of ₹1,38,00,000 for alleged acceptance of cash loans above ₹20,000 in violation of s.269SS. Appeal was delayed by 960 days. Assessee submitted affidavit explaining that he had opted for Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) only for quantum proceedings & believed rectification u/s 154 (pending before CIT(A)) would resolve the issue; hence appeal before Tribunal was filed belatedly as a protect...




