Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Super Plastronics Private Limited (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Super Plastronics Private Limited (ITAT Delhi) Firm’s PAN Used for Imports, Company Had Already Filed ROI – Wrong PAN Triggered Reopening: Delhi ITAT Sends Matter Back—Imports to Be Verified Afresh Revenue filed four appeals—two quantum & two penalty—for AYs 2015-16 & 2016-17. AO had issued notices u/s 148 based on AIMS/NMS information showing significant import transactions against PAN AACFS9943C, which belonged to a firm. Assessee, however, was a private limited company, regularly filing returns since AY 2005-06 under correct PAN AACCS1710N. AO presumed non-filin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930