Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Radhika Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Radhika Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Agra) Reassessment Void—Return Filed to 148 but No 143(2) Issued; AO Took Cognizance of Return Yet Skipped Mandatory Notice The Assessee appealed against the Addl./JCIT(A)-5, Mumbai’s order dated 24.06.2024 confirming reassessment u/s 144 r.w.s.147 dated 29.11.2019. There was a 68-day delay, which Tribunal condoned in the interest of justice. AO had reopened assessment based on information of ₹12,32,000 cash deposit in SBI account. Notice u/s 148 was issued on 31.03.2019. The Assessee filed her return on 22.11.2019. Thereafter, AO issued only 142(1) notices and...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930