Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : NG Brothers Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
NG Brothers Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata) Loans Repaid—Section 68 Cannot Apply These five appeals—three quantum & two penalty—arose from NFAC orders for AYs 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17, concerning additions u/s 68 toward unsecured loans, consequential disallowances of commission & interest, & levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c). The Tribunal disposed all appeals through a consolidated order. AY 2014-15 AO treated unsecured loans of ₹22 lakh (Shresth Builders Pvt Ltd) & ₹50 lakh (BSR Finance & Constructions Pvt Ltd) as unexplained cash credits u/s 68 on the ground that Inspe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930